LANSARY. Energy Bring us the decision
Energy · screen the counterparty

Is this partner safe to commit to before you sign?

A JV partner, a consortium member, a connection counterparty — what looks clean on the contract can hide a parent, a control chain, or a sanctions or screening exposure one or two ownership tiers down.

Settled as the Teaming Evidence Pack
The exposure

Independence checks lean on what a counterparty declares. The tie that matters — the ultimate owner, the adverse control, the screening exposure — usually sits a tier or two below the name on the page, where a self-declaration never reaches.

What the Teaming Evidence Pack settles

Who you’d really be committing to.

Who really owns and controls them?
The parent, the control chain and the ultimate beneficial owner behind the name on the contract.
Is there a sanctions or screening exposure?
An adverse tie, a designation, or a control change that could be called in — traced before it surfaces mid-project.
How sure are we?
Each finding graded against the published standard, and held in confidence.

Typical reader: a developer or OEM partnerships lead.

Why now

Who controls your partner is a live question.

The National Security and Investment Act annual report (22 July 2025) recorded Energy as one of the 17 mandatory-notification sectors and the third most common sector for a final order — the regime’s strongest intervention. A change of control over an energy or CNI counterparty is screenable, and the UK Sanctions List that governs them is a live document. Who controls your partner is a live question, not a formality. See what changed →

Engage

Name the partner you can’t afford to be wrong about.

We’ll trace who really owns and controls them, and any sanctions or screening exposure — to what grade, before you sign.

You may also be asking: Is the position defensible? · Can you deliver the bid?

Part of the Lansary intelligence estate

One independent evidence house. Sector-native doors.